weathericon

Wilton Villager


marketplacetwitter facebook
Sports blog: Warrior Nation

Drinking age forum raises debate



By LAUREN MYLO

lmylo@wiltonvillager.com


WILTON -- Europeans have less of a problem with alcohol. Young people today have a less responsible lifestyle overall. Lowering the drinking age to 18 will give high school students more access to alcohol.

These were some of the arguments supported and refuted during a lively discussion from four panelists at a Wilton Library forum on Thursday entitled: "Re-thinking the Drinking Age: Is 21 Working? Is 18 the Answer?"

The talk was hosted by the Wilton Library and the League of Women Voters, and the topic was put to the test by an author, a college administrator, a family psychologist and a professor -- two who promoted lowering the drinking age and two who did not.

Barrett Seaman, author of "Binge: Campus Life in an Age of Disconnection and Excess" said while staying in college dorms doing research for his book, he found students drink as heavily as they did when he attended college decades ago, but "alcohol had become much more clandestine."

He's also on the board of directors of Choose Responsibility, a nonprofit organization that supports "a series of changes that will allow 18 to 20 year-old adults to purchase, possess and consume alcoholic beverages," according to its Web site.

Choose Responsibility launched the Amethyst Initiative, which has been signed by 130 colleges and universities and encourages debate among schools' leaders on the drinking age.

"I firmly believe it's not about a lower drinking age but addressing a changing culture that has revolved around alcohol," said Seaman.

Linda Degutis, Ph.D., associate professor at Yale University Medical School and immediate past president of the American Public Health Association, said she became interested in the topic when she worked in the ER with trauma patients and noticed an increase of young people with alcohol related incidents.

She said lowering the drinking age won't get to the root of the problem, the real issue is discovering the cause.

"One issue is that there's a reason why this is happening, and maybe it's some reasons that are totally unrelated to age," she said.

Degutis disputed the theory that Europeans, who are brought up around alcohol and enjoy drinks with their families at younger ages than most American children, drink more responsibly, citing a 2007 survey by Mothers Against Drunk Driving that states "the percentage of 15 to 16-year-old students in most European countries who report drinking to intoxication is higher than in the U.S."

She also noted that studies have shown college-aged students who don't attend college drink less than college-aged students who do.

Although Lee Peters, vice president of students affairs at the University of Hartford, is a supporter of the Amethyst Initiative, he made a comment that was agreed upon generally by the panel.

"If we can deal with it behaviorally, we'll have a lot more success than arbitrarily changing the age," said Peters.

John Hamilton, CEO, Regional Networks of Programs, Inc., a nonprofit social service agency specializing in the prevention and treatment of substance abuse, gave his input from the medical field's perspective and noted that Fairfield County's rates of binge drinking in high school is 20 percent higher than the rest of the country.

"11.7 is the average drinking age," he said. "A lot of you (in the audience) are saying, 'what's the problem? I drank in high school.' But did you drink in middle school?"

Hamilton encouraged parents to talk honestly and non-judgmentally with their children, noting that stress is a main factor in what motivates children to drink illegally.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in Wilton Villager community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines. Basically, be civil, smart, on-topic and free from profanity. Don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read! And remember: We may miss some, so we need your help to police these comments. Please identify the comment, the story and why you think it's objectionable.
Read the commenting guidelines

Add a new comment

How can this be an issue when our government is on the verge of bankruptcy? When our country does go bankrupt the drinking age will not be enforced.


Juveniles used to get married in this country since before 1776. The ONLY REASON the age of majority was created is due to inheritance purposes. Up until 80 years ago or so, it was not uncommon for a 14 year old to wed a 26 year old. By the way the Age of Majority back then was 21, not 18.

Many countries around the world have an age of majority of 18, however the working age and marriage age are both lower (marriage for people under a magical age doesn''t always require consent either).

The problem is we are treating our juveniles like spoiled brats, which is why they are so ignorant and have no conception of world affairs. In most countries adulthood is bestowed upon puberty (naturally), take a look at Latin America, you have youths in the work force and there is no problem.

What is happening know is that US credit is drying up due to overconsumption and our youths are going to have to back adults at a younger age again once the Fed really starts running the printing presses and our credit worthiness is deemed junk.

Posted by: overseer | Feb 05, 2009
reply


It doesn''t matter if the drinking age saves lives (far more could be saved by eliminating drunk driving) Always missing from the debate is whether the politicians I voted against ever had any right to impose the drinking age on me without my consent. Proof it doesn''t protect young people is found on my page at http://udadd.com/memorial.html

Posted by: Tom Alciere | Feb 16, 2009
reply