|
|
![]() |
![]()
|
Sex offenders can't find jobs, homes after serving time
Posted on 07/19/2010
By STEVE KOBAK Times Staff Writer STAMFORD -- One year after finishing his prison sentence on child pornography charges, former Stamford volunteer firefighter Dan Rockwell is calling his car his home. Rockwell said he can't find a job or a permanent place to live due to the felony charges following him. Currently in the second year of his 15-year probation sentence, Rockwell said he is trying to comply with his punishment, but he believes the conditions of his probation doom him to failure. "A lot of people are very hostile when they hear about someone in a situation like this," Rockwell said. Bill Anselmo, who oversees the sex offender unit for the state Office of Probation, said offenders often have difficulty finding jobs and places to live, but the complications are due to safeguards designed to protect the public from sex offenders. "Community safety is our number one goal," he said. According to Anselmo, most offenders wind up serving at least some of their suspended sentence, typically because they commit a violation of the conditions of their release. Very few offenders get reconvicted of sex crimes during their probation, according to Anselmo. Rockwell is currently listed as a "non-compliant" offender by the Department of Public Safety because he failed to validate his address. He is facing the prospect of serving all or most of the 10-year suspended prison sentence he received when he was convicted of possession of child pornography in 2008. The vast majority of the public does not sympathize with the predicament of sex offenders like Rockwell. Anselmo said the public generally views the release of a sex offender into their community as a threat to their quality of life. "There is a lot of scrutiny about who they are, where they go, where they work and where they live," said Anselmo. "All eyes are on them." Former Norwalk councilman Peter Wien, who speaks openly about the sex abuse he incurred as a child, believes that the way offenders are treated by society is a reflection of the disregard they had for the mental and physical well-being of their victims. "A lot of them say they're sorry but at the same time, they don't have really good self control," Wien said. In Rockwell's case, Stamford Police seized two laptop computers containing more than 100 images of child pornography from his home, according to police. Child pornography is considered by victim's advocates and law enforcement officials to be a form of revictimization but Rockwell simply calls it a "mistake" that he made out of "curiosity." The process of assimilating sex offenders back into the community begins six to nine months before they are released from prison, Anselmo said. Conditions of the offender's release are set by the court at the time of sentencing and additional conditions may be imposed by a probation officer after the offender is released, Anselmo said. A representative from probation visits the offender in prison and evaluates the offender to find out the level of treatment that he requires. Assessing the offender's level of risk includes giving the offender a polygraph test, which Anselmo said determines whether the convict's history of sexual transgressions extends beyond the crimes of which he has been convicted. "Each offender poses a different risk," he said. The representative also assists the offender in trying to find housing and a job. Outside of prison, it is difficult for even low-risk sex offenders to find employment because of the stigma surrounding convicted sex criminals, Anselmo said. Jobs are pivotal to an offender's rehabilitation because they provide structure, Anselmo said. The job must be approved by a probation officer and the offender cannot have access to potential victims at his place of work, according to Anselmo. "A lot of people say: 'Why can't they find a night job at a factory?' " he said. "The answer is those jobs don't exist anymore." Depending on the crime and the level of risk that the offender poses to the community, probation officers can be flexible about place of employment but sex offenders are limited in their options for housing, Anselmo said. Rockwell said his inability to gain employment means that he cannot come up with the funds required to pay for his sex offender treatment -- to which he currently owes about $700 -- and the money needed to pay rent. He depends on handouts from friends to buy food and gas for his car. Many employers have online applications and because Rockwell cannot use a computer under the conditions of his release, the places to which he can apply are limited. Finding housing for an offender is a difficult ordeal, Anselmo said. Offenders are often shunned by family members and former friends and they have nowhere to turn once the state no longer shelters them in a prison or a halfway house, according to Anselmo. Laws in many states restrict the distance that a sex offender can live from a school but Connecticut does not have state-mandated residency restrictions for registered sex offenders. Connecticut allows judges, probation officers and municipalities to impose residency restrictions on sex offenders. Possession of child pornography is considered a crime against children and Rockwell's conditions of release state that he cannot live within 1,000 feet of a school. Rockwell said that his conviction prevents him from staying at a homeless shelter. He cannot even receive meals at the shelter because of the likelihood that he may be in the vicinity of a child. According to Anselmo, some shelters limit the number of sex offenders who are allowed to sleep at the facilities but family shelters and shelters that have female residents do not allow sex offenders who committed crimes against children to use their services. Since he was released from the halfway house in September 2009, Rockwell has been living at motels when he manages to scrape together enough cash, and living on friends' couches. He said many of his family members live out of the area and the majority of his friends have shunned him since his arrest. Rockwell said the friends he has left do not allow him to stay at their homes for extended periods of time because they do not want their address to appear on the sex offender registry. Rockwell currently sleeps in his Jeep and is listed as homeless on the sex offender registry. Although sex offenders like Rockwell face stringent conditions and multiple obstacles upon their release, Wien believes the criminal justice system should place additional restrictions on offenders like Rockwell. "Like the old saying goes: 'Don't do the crime if you can't do the time,'" he said. Wien said offenders should also have to pay restitution to their victims. He said he has paid tens of thousands of dollars for therapy because of the actions of the man who molested him. "The offender has to register but the victim goes through life trying to be normal," he said. "It screws up a kid's identity. Victims often suffer in silence."
COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in Wilton Villager community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines. Basically, be civil, smart, on-topic and free from profanity. Don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read! And remember: We may miss some, so we need your help to police these comments. Please identify the comment, the story and why you think it's objectionable.
Read the commenting guidelines |
2. Police: Fairfield man charged with computer crime after hacking into former Wilton employer's system |
Posted by: ms.mika | Apr 07, 2011
reply
There is a completely and utterly difference between someone who is brutally abused compared to the someone who has child porn on their computer. How can you compare Jeffery Dahmer to someone who has child porn on their computer or worse, has a sexual offense against a child? Yet, doesn''t that child still live and have choices in life?
Don''t misunderstand what I''m writing here. Anyone that commits a sexual offense needs to be held accountable. And, anyone that has been sexually abused needs to seek counseling. Turning to drugs to deal with the trauma of being abused is not an excuse that makes it o.k. Blaming your abuser for you not being able to achieve the American Dream isn''t helping either.
Nevertheless, accountability doesn''t mean denial of American Dream because even a child that has been brutally raped by an 85 year old sick man can still become President of the United States with the right help. What''s really sick is comparing that 85 year old sick man to likes of Jeffery Dahmer and other serial child rapist/murders who went beyond sexual gratification with children. Jeffery''s victims have no chance at all to recover and heal. The 85 year old man''s victims have plenty of chances to recover and reach the American Dream of having a house in the suburbs with a spouse, two and half kids and stable job. The 85 year old man, should he survive his sentence, will be branded for the entire world to see and denied the right to have a job that pays his bills, denied a place to live, denied the ability to travel, denied the access to re-entry programs and forever compared to the likes of Dahmer. And you say this only serves him right?
We all have choices in life. We can chose to continue to play victim or we can seek help to live a fulfilling life. That choice is yours and can''t be taken away because you were abused sexually, emotionally and/or physically.
This message is from a adult whom was kidnapped,sexually tortured by my kidnappers and left for dead in an abandon house when she was a child by 4 girls who were encouraged to do this as part of their initiation into a gang.
I also sexually abused 4 boys unrelated to what happened to me as a child. I had other issues which weren''t addressed until much later into my adult years which led to sexual deviancy. I know where I went wrong and I could just as easily play the victim card for why I did what I did. But that won''t help me heal nor will have justified my deviant actions. Yet, psychologist say that the trauma I suffered had a major impact on my behavior. The truth is, no it didn''t. I had completely forgotten about the incident until my mother brought it up in one of my therapy sessions. My therapist then tried to relate my behavior to this incident and I knew it had nothing to do with why I behaved the way I did back then. After many months of fighting with my therapist to address what I felt was the real issue, she finally began to address the issues that caused my deviant behavior. I was able to heal myself and change my life around.
I''ve since gone on to obtain a Bachelor degree. I plan to graduate with a Master degree in Accounting next year. Despite my many accomplishments and not being listed on the sex offender registry, there are people working very hard to have me listed because they feel I should be listed. They can''t believe people change. I''m a representative that people do change and not every sexual offender is a Jeffery Dahmer who needs to be watched 24 hours a day. Not every sexual offender is a pedophile lurking in bushes and cursing elementary school yards looking for their next victim.
I also understand that not everyone is willing and able to forgive and heal. But, as long as I have breath in my body, I will fight against all those that continue to say that a sexual offender can never be healed and become a productive citizen in this society. I will also fight for the victims to heal.
You can chose to see me for who I am today, or you can chose to stay focused on what I did 14 years ago. That''s your choice.
Posted by: anonymous | Jan 20, 2011
reply
Posted by: anonymous | Mar 19, 2011
reply
1. Most offenders, which are Level 1, never had contact with an actual minor. No ''child'' was ever ''molested''.
2. Few, if any, go to prison. Some don''t even have probation or rehab.
3. The public still babbles on about how they can''t be saved, or healed. Nonsense.
4. There is a HUGE difference between a Level 1 and a Level 3, yet the public does not differentiate as they do when considering involuntary manslaughter versus 1st degree murder.
5. We still claim that after punishment, a person is allowed a second chance to re-join society, but obviously we lie.
6. We almost always assume it''s a dirty old man, but there are more young men, and plenty of women, that are registered.
Posted by: anonymous | Jul 23, 2010
reply
What makes this moron think that Sex Offenders will be able to pay restitution to their victims when they can''t get jobs?
It is very simple to understand.
No job=No money.
No money=No restitution.
If it was me, where is my incentive to obey the law? I''d prefer to be locked up, where I''ll get medical care, three square meals, a place to sleep and it is all free courtesy of the taxpayer, and to really stick it to the taxpayer, their taxes will have to be raised otherwise I am released early.
If you ask me, Wien is a serious sex offender since he is obviously whoring for votes and public support for badly written laws.
Posted by: The Emperor | Aug 01, 2010
reply
Public registries, residency laws, and related laws have negative impact on those targeted by these laws. I''m sure many of you are thinking, "What''s the big deal?" The "big deal" is there are a lot more to these laws than you think.
#1: The vast majority of sex crimes occur in the home by a loved one who is most likely not on the registry. Stranger danger is the biggest, most prevailing myth out there. It happens about as often as million dollar lottery winners, only we here every detail for weeks on the news.
#2: Most on the registry do not re-offend, and that number is reduced with successful treatment and reintegration programs. Instability, denial of employment and housing options gives incentives to turn to crime as a means of survival.
#3: A growing number of people are landing on the registry for stuff like sexting, public urination, or teens having consensual sex with other teens.
#4: The registry promotes the mob mentality and vigilante violence. Studies have shown up to 40% of registrants and loved ones have experienced vigilante violence.
Our entire approach to this issue is wrong. The focus on stranger danger, "pedophiles," and revenge-motivated laws are all backfiring.
Posted by: oncefallendotcom | Jul 20, 2010
reply
I can''t even get a state judge to see that the hard drive seized in 2001 was a 40gb and FDLE did not find any child porn on it according to their lab report, after compiling all the public and court records the charging evidence with was alledged to be a "MPEG" file that was sent to him a no name local cop was never found "no chain of custody" the state''s file, 7 volumes or appellate record, and when I sued the sheriff for the charging evidence in a civil case the judge let them create a record in 2007, and the sheriff NOW claims the 60gb hard drive contains child porn and the judge sealed the drive under court order, I started my own computer repair business how can a hard drive grow ?, it''s so bad here in Duval county I can''t even pay a lawyer to help me correct this corruption case, the crime was not even a sex crime when I plead, FS 847.0138 (2001).
Posted by: Curt | Oct 03, 2010
reply
Public registries, residency laws, and related laws have negative impact on those targeted by these laws. I''m sure many of you are thinking, "What''s the big deal?" The "big deal" is there are a lot more to these laws than you think.
#1: The vast majority of sex crimes occur in the home by a loved one who is most likely not on the registry. Stranger danger is the biggest, most prevailing myth out there. It happens about as often as million dollar lottery winners, only we here every detail for weeks on the news.
#2: Most on the registry do not re-offend, and that number is reduced with successful treatment and reintegration programs. Instability, denial of employment and housing options gives incentives to turn to crime as a means of survival.
#3: A growing number of people are landing on the registry for stuff like sexting, public urination, or teens having consensual sex with other teens.
#4: The registry promotes the mob mentality and vigilante violence. Studies have shown up to 40% of registrants and loved ones have experienced vigilante violence.
Our entire approach to this issue is wrong. The focus on stranger danger, "pedophiles," and revenge-motivated laws are all backfiring.
Posted by: oncefallendotcom | Jul 20, 2010
reply
I have never done anything to a child nor do I have any sexual interest in a child. I have a post-graduate degree, and good career, and a family of two boys.
During my time out on bail, I have taken psychological test, sexual assessment tests that all show I have normal interest in women and not children. Yet, none of that matters when considering child porn possession. Yet, the label of sexual offender is still attached despite the fact that I am not interested in the material.
I have many friends that are supporting me through this ordeal and have known me for many years. They are also aware that for years, I have been in an abusive relationship and that when I decided to leave that relationship, two day later my she calls the cops and tells them I have all this child porn all over my computers.
Yet, despite my relationship woes and my non sexual interest in children. I am going to be the next sex offender that the public needs protection from... When I have never hurt nor would hurt anybody of any age or gender. The fact that a child or an adult is a victim to anybody sexually, mentally or physically disturbs me.
However, where is the fairness in all of this? Not all people who get convicted of possession of child porn are sexual predators or have ever had any sexual interest in children. So how are people that fall into my scenario a threat to anybody? I am just made an untouchable because I can''t prove that I was set-up by a vindictive wife who chose to steal my sons by making me into a freaking sicko.
Posted by: Helpless Dad | Oct 07, 2010
reply
Posted by: Henry | Oct 11, 2011
reply
I do not believe the story about the man in the article "experimenting" when 100+ images were found on his computer. That is NOT experimenting, that''s a PROBLEM. He seems to have an affinity for child porn. He should be permitted to work, but he blew his chance and his right to pursue the American dream when he obtained those images. Those children are forever damaged and while he didn''t physically molest them, he victimized them by creating a market for their abuse. He does not deserve to have a brighter future than his victims. Decades after the abuse I still suffer from PTSD, have to take medication, see a psychiatrist AND a therapist, all at my own expense. I do not recall when I lost my virginity, but I do remember the hurt, depression and confusion that is all I have ever known. In spite of all of the diligent work I''ve done in therapy, this burden will follow me to the grave. It has affected every aspect of my life and people don''t seem to understand that you don''t just go to a few therapy sessions and you''re magically cured. Being abused is a horribly traumatic experience for anyone. I think it''s too bad that society seems to think that the trauma suffered by the victims of sex abuse/assault don''t matter and the offender should have a clean slate once they "pay their debt to society". The more important issue is that they can never repay their debt to their victim(s), nor do most try. Once lost, innocence cannot be regained and the world as we know it is forever jaded.
Forgiveness is wonderful, but let''s not have a pity party for those who victimize others.
Posted by: anonymous | Jan 07, 2011
reply
Posted by: confused daughter | Nov 16, 2010
reply
Posted by: shocking reprecussions | Nov 23, 2010
reply
Posted by: So..In..Love n Confused | Dec 01, 2010
reply
After 12 years you''re father is still feeling the effects of HIS wrong doing? How do you think the victim is doing? Do you think that victim has any rights? Your father at least has a supportive family-how do you know whether that victim fell prey to your father has a supportive family? Is s/he depressed? Abusing drugs or alcohol to cope with the pain? Paying for therapy and medication to deal with the abuse s/he will suffer from forever?
Sorry, I don''t feel sorry for him. I think he''s getting what he deserves since victims of sexual assault have to deal with it for the rest of their lives.
Posted by: anonymous | Jan 07, 2011
reply
Posted by: anonymous | Feb 12, 2011
reply
Posted by: Victim no more | Mar 19, 2011
reply
Posted by: anonymous | Mar 03, 2011
reply
Posted by: Anon | Nov 16, 2011
reply